 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1.5 million served &#8211; who says Rails doesn&#8217;t scale?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.adsdevshop.com/2007/05/25/15-million-served-who-says-rails-doesnt-scale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.adsdevshop.com/2007/05/25/15-million-served-who-says-rails-doesnt-scale/</link>
	<description>Helping companies increase predicability and business agility.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:24:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Dempsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.adsdevshop.com/2007/05/25/15-million-served-who-says-rails-doesnt-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Dempsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 14:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcfl.com/blog/?p=106#comment-980</guid>
		<description>Jerret,

Thank you for your comment, and for helping me to clarify. 1.5 million is more a measurement of traffic handling than scalability. The scalability comes in with the fact that CourseAdvisor went from handling 1M to 1.5M users per month, and are experiencing continued growth. From the interview with CourseAdvisor, they are using some interesting techniques to handle the traffic growth. Thanks again for helping me to clarify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerret,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment, and for helping me to clarify. 1.5 million is more a measurement of traffic handling than scalability. The scalability comes in with the fact that CourseAdvisor went from handling 1M to 1.5M users per month, and are experiencing continued growth. From the interview with CourseAdvisor, they are using some interesting techniques to handle the traffic growth. Thanks again for helping me to clarify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jherber</title>
		<link>http://blog.adsdevshop.com/2007/05/25/15-million-served-who-says-rails-doesnt-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>jherber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 14:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcfl.com/blog/?p=106#comment-979</guid>
		<description>scaling has to do with an architecture providing a linear cost path to handle more concurrent users.  not overall volume...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scaling has to do with an architecture providing a linear cost path to handle more concurrent users.  not overall volume&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerrett</title>
		<link>http://blog.adsdevshop.com/2007/05/25/15-million-served-who-says-rails-doesnt-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 06:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcfl.com/blog/?p=106#comment-975</guid>
		<description>While I believe Rails is perfectly capable of scaling, 1.5 million users in a month is not an example of scalability in any sense of the word!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I believe Rails is perfectly capable of scaling, 1.5 million users in a month is not an example of scalability in any sense of the word!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
